Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dr Repally Shiva Praveen Kumar


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  18:20, 3 August 2016 (UTC)

Dr Repally Shiva Praveen Kumar

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

failsWP:GNG, no indication of notability The Banner talk 23:07, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. North America1000 06:03, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. North America1000 06:03, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. North America1000 06:03, 27 July 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. Nothing here suggests notability but more like self aggrandisement. No references show anything other than local awareness, and most are unacceptable YouTube clips.  Velella  Velella Talk 08:42, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. Sources cited do nothing to establish notability. Maproom (talk) 08:47, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment: I see that an article on R. S. Praveen Kumar was speedied two days ago. Maproom (talk) 08:51, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment: Also previously created and speedily deleted as Dr Repalle Shiva Praveen Kumar. Nthep (talk) 10:00, 27 July 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete Another non-notable Indian doctor. Engleham (talk) 11:57, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
 * He's a police officer, not a doctor. But he's still not notable. Maproom (talk) 20:51, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment: The article Dr. R S Praveen Kumar was speedy deleted today. Ca2james (talk) 23:15, 27 July 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete His claim to notability is that he became secretary of the Andhra Pradesh Social Welfare Residential Educational Institutions Society (APSWREI Society_ but there aren't sufficient sources that provide significant coverage of him. If there was an APSWREI Society article, I'd suggest redirecting this article to that one. Ca2james (talk) 23:15, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as still advertorial and also then nothing actually convincing of independent notability. SwisterTwister   talk  06:54, 28 July 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete Fails WP:BIO and a puff piece so also fails WP:SPAM. ukexpat (talk) 15:54, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete No notability, no verifiability. Millbug  talk 04:21, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
 * I would like to bring to your notice that I have given the reference for the Indian Police Medal and Gallantry . Hence, I request you to consider this content or article as original and remove from the speedy delete option. And I request you to give me suggestions to improve it for better content.Shanker Sampangi (talk) 16:23, 1 August 2016 (UTC)
 * He is recipient of Police Medal (India) from Government of India in 2011. Hence he is a notable person according to Wiki notability guidelines. We can remove the deletion log for this distinguished police officer.Rajasekhar1961 06:31, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
 * The Police Medal is certainly not a high enough award for inherent notability. -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:41, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

could you please suggest me. Shanker Sampangi (talk) 15:38, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Dear Ma'am i have given sufficient reference but what actually i want add in this project?
 * Dear all, He is also recipient of Police Medal for Gallantry in 2002 he is a notable person according to Wikipedia guidelines.. Hence i request you to remove the deletion log for this distinguished Administrator as well as Police officer from India. 15:58, 2 August 2016 (UTC)Shanker Sampangi (talk)
 * Speedy Delete. Sources cited do nothing to establish notability. he Police Medal is certainly not a high enough award for inherent notability Uncletomwood (talk) 15:45, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

Request for not to delete Dear sir i have clearly mentioned that the Indian Police Medal and also The Police Medal for Gallantry both are highly reputed Medals in Indian Police Service. if you have any doubt you please read those two referencesShanker Sampangi (talk) 16:37, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
 * He is also recipient of John Kenneth Galbraith Fellowship from Harvard Kennedy School, Harvard University, USA 2011. Hence i request you to remove the deletion log. Shanker Sampangi (talk) 17:22, 2 August 2016 (UTC)Shanker Sampangi (talk) 17:23, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

Let me check the sources: The Banner talk 17:44, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
 * 1) LIST OF AWARDEES OF GALLANTRY MEDALS ON THE OCCASION OF REPUBLIC  DAY 2013: Not mentioned
 * 2) Chedanam: A blog is not a reliable source conform WP:RS. He is mentioned, but the list is so fuzzy that it made nothing clear.
 * 3) POLICE MEDAL FOR MERITORIOUS SERVICE INDEPENDENCE DAY-2011: Mentioned, but this is a medal for being a good boy, not gallantry
 * 4) IPS officer dons role of student: man with a job is doing his job
 * 5) Fellowships: no proof given


 * Here i am giving you proof of Fellowship, another Proof for Police Medal Gallantry . Hence i request you to remove delete log. Shanker Sampangi (talk) 18:34, 2 August 2016 (UTC)


 * Dear Sir/ Ma'am If you want check The Police Medal for Gallantry you please check in the website website provide you information regarding Police Medal for Gallantry. you please follow Name: R S Praveen Kumar, Year: 2002, State/ Organisation: Andhra Pradesh, Medal Name: Police Medal for Gallantry. I hope i have given sufficient details for your question.Shanker Sampangi (talk) 18:42, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Here i am giving another proof for R S Praveen Kumar IPS for recognition of his notability, He is also recipient of Sakshi Excellence Award in 2014 as Telugu Person of the Year Dr. R. S. Praveen Kumar . Hence i request you to remove deletion log.14.139.86.99 (talk) 08:54, 3 August 2016 (UTC)14.139.86.99 (talk) 08:55, 3 August 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.