Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dr Sheikh Mohammad Iqbal (Kashmir)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. (WP:NPASR). (Non-administrator closure) NorthAmerica1000 00:33, 22 September 2014 (UTC)

Dr Sheikh Mohammad Iqbal (Kashmir)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article of unclear Notability. Article fails General Notability Guildlines. It fails Academics it also fails WP:BASIC. Article differs from this notable historian I found. Wikicology (talk) 00:20, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  Ascii002 Talk Contribs GuestBook 00:53, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  Ascii002 Talk Contribs GuestBook 00:53, 29 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Comment&mdash;I'm seeing several books authored by the subject of the article. The holdings are not particularly impressive, but that's not necessarily out of line for that time and this topic.  The Mission of Islam, Realms of peace, Ideals of Islam & other essays, Emergence of Saudi Arabia : a political study of King Abd al-Aziz ibn Saud, 1901-1953, Islamic toleration & justice : non-Muslims under Muslim rule, Saudi Arabia, an epitome of history & progress, Saudi Arabia, era of reconstruction, 1961-1981, and The culture of Kashmir.  Lesser Cartographies (talk) 12:57, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:02, 30 August 2014 (UTC)
 * VIAF.org has the author of those books born in 1928 not 1929, maybe a calendar error. Stuartyeates (talk) 00:27, 13 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e deckertalk 21:57, 6 September 2014 (UTC)

 
 * Delete unless categorical identification can be achieved and works can be matched to their author. There are a LOT of similarly named people in google scholar, at least two of whom appear to be notable, but they don't appear to be this person. 00:27, 13 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep Apparently notable author and academic. I see no reason whateverto doubt the bibliography--they all fall soundly within his areas of work.  DGG ( talk ) 05:12, 14 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 12:12, 14 September 2014 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.