Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dr paul


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Speedy delete as blatant advertisement. Guy (Help!) 12:26, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

Dr paul

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Promotion for the theories/books/products/services of one psychiatrist. No evidence that these theories are influential, widely recognized, or notable. No external sources. And did I mention, blatantly promotional?
 * Note: I am also including the nearly identical article Mindos in this nomination. FreplySpang 06:23, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Vanispamcruftisement Pete.Hurd 06:53, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete for the beyond blatant promotion, lack of useful encyclopedic content, and failure to meet WP:N. janejellyroll 07:04, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per all above, "Dr paul" didn't even bother to capitalize his vanity articles properly. Krimpet 07:24, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete - g12 spam, and so tagged. Part Deux 07:38, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.