Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dr sol adoni


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Speedy delete, WP:SPAM and WP:SNOW. Author's argument is "the world is conspiring against me to keep me and my theory from becoming known". That won't work here. NawlinWiki (talk) 20:39, 26 August 2014 (UTC)

Dr sol adoni

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Because the article makes him sound significant, I'm not speedying this, but I can't find evidence of notability for this living person. Few Google hits, no Google Scholar hits, and the word "ennisa" itself returns only 208 hits in a Google search, with none that I can see in a quick scan giving the impression of being an organization that publishes papers on mathematical topics. —Largo Plazo (talk) 18:38, 26 August 2014 (UTC)

This editor is trying to supress information about Dr Adoni and his 8 Prime Spirals released in 1995. Since then his 30Mod prime work was used by Sieve of Atkin 60mod work. Dr. Adoni is well known since he has authored many books and there are many news articles on him. The person trying to delete this page which is needed due to the 8 prime spiral of Dr. Adoni and his HelixQ work as well, is a lone Russian editor trying to keep the world ignorant of the major prime discoveries of Dr. Adoni. PyPrimes was used to verify how significant the 8 prime spirals are, since they out performed all prime algorithms tested included wheel factorization and seive of Eratosthenes. So the page is needed as a reference to the work of Dr. Adoni, that being his 1995 paper the Ennisa Formula in which 30mod, 60mod and 90mod prime algorithms were discussed. Since that work 60mod prime algorithm work of Atkin has been accepted as a major advance in primality, even though it was really discovered almost 10 years earlier. There are many usenet debates from the 1990's over how important this discovery was. Now 20 years later with PyPrimes and the sieve of Atkin being found to be significant work, the original work of Dr Adoni should be cited properly at Wiki. To ignore his 1995 work that is well documented in Usenet from the 1990's would be a gross violation of acknowledging the real discover of 30mod, 60mod and 90mod prime theory. Drprinceton (talk) 19:33, 26 August 2014 (UTC)drprinceton


 * I never heard of him before the the three articles you created appeared today, and I know nothing about the theory, let alone do I have an opinion on it. Therefore, your impression that I'm trying to "suppress" anything about Adoni or his theories is absurd. Please read the explanations I've been providing with all my deletion requests. They all explain quite exactly what my rationale is: Use of Wikipedia to advocate for a theory, in violation of the neutral point of view policy, and selection of topics that don't meet Wikipedia's criteria for verifiability, let alone notability, given an apparent lack of independent reliable sources on those topics. —Largo Plazo (talk) 19:39, 26 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete. Non-notable WP:FRINGE researcher, with no evidence of passing WP:PROF or WP:GNG let alone the mainstream attention to his fringe researches that would allow us to cover them in a properly neutral way. Helixq and 8 prime spirals should probably also be deleted, again for lack of mainstream attention or secondary sourcing that would show notability and allow neutral coverage. —David Eppstein (talk) 20:32, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Drprinceton (talk) 00:08, 27 August 2014 (UTC)drprinceton

Wiki nazis have already deleted the 3 articles, it's why most in Academia consider wiki to be a JOKE. The original article was ocmpletely neutral despite what some mod happy person believes. The fact wiki deleted all 3 articles shows how slanted wiki is.

FACTS

2012 prime spirals were PROVEN in a test by PyPrimes part of the Python Project to be faster than all known prime algorithms, that's MAJOR NEWS and the 8 Prime Spirals are what this new algorithm is called.

Now there is some minor debate about who theorized the 30Mod Prime Spirals and besides 30Mod prime spirals being front and center in PyPrimes a GITHUB project that an real expert forum on mathematics compared to wiki, the work done in PyPrimes testing the sieve of Eratosthenes (a wiki article) and prime wheel factorization (a wiki article) all got beaten in speed by 8 PRIME SPIRALS.

THAT IS MAJOR MATHEMATICS NEWS

Now the 60Mod prime algorithm known as sieve of Atkin has a wiki page too, so Python the computer language project that test the prime algorithms, the ancient sieve of Eratosthenes, sieve of Atkins, prime wheel factorization all have WIKI PAGES, yet the new kid on the block that BEAT THEM ALL and the test was done at GITHUB the top site for such open academic evaluations IMO, says 8 Prime Spirals or 30Mod prime algorithm IS THE KING OF THE HILL in creating primes. It beat all the algorithms you have pages on. Yet the new fast algorithm you want to ignore. PyPrimes used GITHUB to verify the results. Anyone can download PyPrimes and test all the prime algorithms YOU HAVE PAGES ON, and they all lose compared to 8 PRIME SPIRALS yet this site (wiki) is now deleting any mention of the 8 Prime Spirals, the person who created it in 1995 and his new project a new computer language using his now proven math theories.

So GITHUB was cited, Python is a major wiki page, wheel factorization is a major wiki page, sieve of Eratosthenes is a major wiki page and even the sieve of Atkin all have pages.

YOU SEE WHAT A JOKE WIKI IS deleting the proven fastest algrithm that people are now SEARCHING FOR INFO ON.

Anyone can see the original article it was neutral, yet wiki allowed it to be deleted.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/8_prime_spirals

Now there is controvsey over the claims to who discovered 30Mod prime theory, and Usenet has numerous of posts showing Dr. Adoni was discussing 30Mod, 60Mod and 90Mod prime algorithms. SO IT IS HIS WORK.

Yet in 2004 Atkin comes along and now you have a page about his 60Mod theory, guess what 60Mod prime theory and 30Mod and 90Mod were all discussed in the 1990's in usenet due to DR ADONI's work.

Now do any of you see how foolish wiki looks deleting the page.

So does a test PROVING the significance of 30Mod prime algorithm being fastest than all known prime algorithms that all have wiki pages warrant a page for the KING OF PRIMES ALGORITHMS?

YES IT DOES

For anyone to say test results subject to peer review by academics on GITHUB is not a trusted source look foolish.

SO THE CITE TO THE TESTS on GITHUB via PYPRIMES is defacto proof of a neutral source to make the claims.

OR DO NONE OF YOU GET THAT?

GITHUB is the neutral source CITED as proof 8 Prime Spirals are now KING OF THE HILL in primality, and that is NEWS WORTHY. Since wiki has so much stuff on the slower primes to not have a page on the 8 Prime Spirals citing GITHUB and PYPRIMES as proof it is real, is a JOKE.

Anyway, I'll just email the Adoni group what this site is doing and how they think I'm him, or an assoicate, so they can laugh at WIKI and maybe put notice on their network to the moronic statments made here.

PUT THE PAGE BACK

a. The cite to GITHUB and PYPRIMES open source test is PROOF of the claims, anyone can download Python and PyPrimes and test all the algorithms YOU HAVE PAGES ON and guess what Einsteins, all your wiki page algorithms LOSE to the Prime Spirals.

b. Sieve of Atkins uses 60Mod prime theory, guess what Dr. Adoni had it in his work on 30Mod prime TEN YEARS EARLIER, so his work is connected to that as well.

C. Prime Wheel Factorization a wiki page, it lost to the Adoni Prime Spirals too, yet you think wiki should not discuss prime spiral theory?

D. Sieve of Eratosthenes, 2300 years old now and the first prime algorithm to out perform it, THE ADONI PRIME SPIRALS

Now the article noted Atkins is using work that was public for almost 10 years. The article noted an ERROR in calling the prime spirals croft spirals since Steven Croft claimed to have discovered them in 2010. Yet the fact is Usenet has the discussion on 30Mod, 60Mod and 90Mod prime theory in the 1990's way before Atkin or Croft made any claims to them.

Anyway, to see sledge hammer nazi level censorship at wiki shows why WIKI IS A JOKE to academics.

For this topic to say GITHUB is not a major cite is a JOKE. For this topic to say a new prime algorithm that has beaten all the prime algorithms listed on Wiki is a JOKE as to the topic not being relevant.

PUT THE PAGE BACK

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/8_prime_spirals

Drprinceton (talk) 00:08, 27 August 2014 (UTC)drprinceton