Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dražen stojanović


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. SNOW, A7, any applies Tone 08:42, 19 December 2011 (UTC)

Dražen stojanović

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Totally unreferenced BLP. BLP Prod removed twice by article author. On the face this would seem to be a notable person, however I can find no coverage in any RSes, news, web, or other. Submitted for consensus. Liv it ⇑ Eh?/What? 16:54, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - I almost flagged this as a hoax. It certainly reads like one, especially the bits about multiple diplomas and forgetting what school he was attending. MikeWazowski (talk) 17:09, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Croatia-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 17:34, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 17:34, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Slovenia-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 17:36, 18 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete - taking this purely at face value, it is a biography of a living person with no references of any kind. Searching on ("Dražen stojanović" "procter and gamble") turns up nothing usable though the claim of being a manager of P&G seems to be true. Simplest conclusion: not notable. Chiswick Chap (talk) 17:56, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - not a notable person. A search in Croatian gave me verification that the person exists because they represented their company in a publicized humanitarian drive, but nothing else of any relevance. Even the title is misspelled. --Joy &#91;shallot&#93; (talk) 18:17, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete – I couldn't find multiple reliable sources giving this subject significant coverage. JFHJr (㊟) 22:26, 18 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete. Lacks reliable independent secondary sources to establish notability as required by WP:GNG.  Googling suggests they don't exist.  Msnicki (talk) 02:27, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete as BLP with no credible claims of notability - no references offered in the article. Baffle gab1978 (talk) 06:54, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.