Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DraXsiS


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 02:16, 14 June 2009 (UTC)

DraXsiS

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Fails WP:BAND. A google search for notability brings back no significant hits. Zero hits on google news. Article has no references. The band is unsigned and haven't released any albums on any major labels. --  Darth Mike (talk) 05:27, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete unsigned band with no apparent independent coverage. --skew-t (talk) 12:14, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  -- TexasAndroid (talk) 13:57, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy per A7/db-band. Reading quickly (because the article is long and boring), I don't see an assertion of notable tours, a label, or anything else notable. - Dank (push to talk) 02:40, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment. I think it's unbecoming of any editor, let alone an administrator, to call for deletion of an article, let alone speedy deletion, without reading the article properly. If someone can take the time to write an article then the least courtesy that we can pay is to take the time to read it. Phil Bridger (talk) 21:25, 8 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Speedy per A7. Very little sourcing on Google, no evidence given that verifiable sourcing might exist offline. I just declined a speedy tag because of this existing AfD, but I really don't see any grounds for keeping it.--SarekOfVulcan (talk) 16:16, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, but not speedy delete. The article claims more than one album released, and determining whether the label is important enough for that to pass WP:MUSIC criterion 5 requires examination of sources, so needs scrutiny at AfD rather than unilateral deletion. On looking through the Google web results I can't see anything that looks to me, as a non-expert in this field, to be an independent reliable source, and Google News finds nothing. Phil Bridger (talk) 21:36, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete, per SarekOfVulcan. I was hoping this link would provide some evidence of significance, but was sorely disappointed. :( --Kuzaar-T-C- 12:41, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.