Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Draconic creature (Dungeons & Dragons)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Lord Roem ~ (talk) 19:31, 11 November 2019 (UTC)

Draconic creature (Dungeons & Dragons)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The article has no secondary sources, and no secondary sources can be found with a quick web search. There is no indication that the fictional creatures listed on the page have any sort of significance in real world. Article fails WP:GNG, WP:JUSTPLOT and WP:GAMEGUIDE. Not a very active user (talk) 18:25, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Not a very active user (talk) 18:25, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. Not a very active user (talk) 18:25, 4 November 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete - Completely in-universe, only primary-sourced game information. Not only that, but this seems to be somewhat of a synthesis of several different ideas and concepts from D&D, rather than a single, coherent topic, united only by the idea that these creatures are "similar" to dragons.  Searches bring up no reliable sources, and even the non-reliable or fan sources that come up do not match the information being presented here.  Rorshacma (talk) 18:50, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and Rorshacma. Non-notable gamecruft.ZXCVBNM (TALK) 03:24, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fantasy-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 10:14, 5 November 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete, per nom. The article lacks secondary reliable sources, fails notability. Alex-h (talk) 14:46, 8 November 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.