Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Draconity (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Otherkin.   A rbitrarily 0   ( talk ) 02:38, 21 January 2010 (UTC)

Draconity
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

This is an article on an obscure branch of the otherkin subculture (which is itself pretty obscure). It has no reliable sources whatsoever, and on searching I was unable to find any - the only people who used the word 'draconity' are these people themselves. An article on the same subject was previously redirected back in 2006 at Articles for deletion/Draconity, but I think it should be deleted outright - there's no evidence that this is a notable concept. Robofish (talk) 23:46, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Redirect, probably. I wrote this article when I was naive as to Wikipedia policy, way back in the day; it was rightfully merged to otherkin.  It looks like someone has recreated it as a standalone article.  Since there has been a merger in the past, outright deletion might prove thorny due to attribution of previously merged information, but it certainly does not merit an article of its own at this point. Shereth 02:58, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Redirect. I find it highly unlikely there are significant RSs on the topic, given the dearth of them for the otherkin article. Titanium Dragon (talk) 07:19, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.