Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dracula's Return


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. JForget 01:03, 9 August 2009 (UTC)

Dracula's Return
AfDs for this article: 
 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Spam. David Logan's page is also up for deletion as non-notable spam work of sockpuppets. VsevolodKrolikov (talk) 17:21, 2 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Note This non-notable book has been spammed across wikipedia.


 * Delete as absolutely not notable spam. Sarah 02:02, 3 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Vsevolod, this is a pretty extensive problem and I think it might be best to deal with it in one AFD as our friend has been busy creating a bunch of articles about this book and it's characters etc. Could you please bundle Daria Borisovna Semovsky, Semovsky Palace and Alexander Pavlovich Semovsky. There might be more, I'm still looking but I think as these are all about this book, it would be best to bundle them all together rather than have individual articles for each one. Cheers, Sarah 02:32, 3 August 2009 (UTC)


 * OK, good idea. Er...how do I that? (Or can you do it?)VsevolodKrolikov (talk) 02:47, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
 * I would do it but I've run out of time for now and have to head off. There's instructions here AFD. It's best to do it as soon as possible so the people who review can comment on all of them otherwise it gets a bit tricky, but if you have problems doing it, I will come and help you when I get back or perhaps someone else could kindly help. Also, there's a pre-existing discussion on AN about this user and I've raised this spam issue there Administrators'_noticeboard. I've reverted the most obvious problems of spamming, where he's added his book into very loosely related articles but I think we're going to have to look into this more closely. Cheers, Sarah 03:57, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Bundled. DrKiernan (talk) 14:45, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Thank you. I didn't have time to sit down and focus on this.VsevolodKrolikov (talk) 15:07, 3 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. Totally non-notable. Orderinchaos 10:17, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 17:28, 3 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete Cannot locate this book in any library, US or Australian. DGG (talk) 05:37, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete all Non-notable: no independent third-party coverage. DrKiernan (talk) 08:55, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.