Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dragón Negro


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 00:38, 21 January 2010 (UTC)

Dragón Negro

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Here's an unsourced article, written by User:Huertacomics, about a new comic book character created by Angel Huerta. My searches on "Dragón Negro" "Angel Huerta" plus "Dragón Negro" "Angel Huerta" gives 23 GHits. There's a review on the blog comikaze.blogspot.com, and not much else I can find; certainly nothing in reliable sources. Looking for information on "Huma Comics" doesn't get me any farther.  Glenfarclas  ( talk ) 20:08, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: correct spelling of article creator is User:Humacomics. Cordless Larry (talk) 23:02, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
 * You're right, sorry. My point remains, as Drag&oacute;n Negro is supposed to be "the first superhero in the Huma Comics universe."   Glenfarclas   ( talk ) 00:02, 15 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete since the subject appears to fail to meet notability requirements. The article can always be started again if this changes with time. Cordless Larry (talk) 21:11, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this character. Joe Chill (talk) 21:14, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:46, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:46, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - I flagged the problems when this was written in Spanish but translation has helped make it much clearer and it is solidly failing even WP:V, let alone WP:N. (Emperor (talk) 17:35, 15 January 2010 (UTC))
 * Delete as failing notability guidelines. No prejudice against recreation if the subject later becomes notable. Edward321 (talk) 13:41, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.