Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Drag City (record label)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Tone 15:25, 12 December 2010 (UTC)

Drag City (record label)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Nearly a year and the article still isn't sourced. I gave a good faith effort to find sources but could not. Uberciter (talk) 01:50, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  -- Jclemens-public (talk) 02:45, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment. Sources exist: Spin magazine, Boston Phoenix, The Stranger, Chicago Reader. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 04:22, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep. Lots of coverage found including the SPIN feature, Chicago Tribune articles, and several articles in Billboard, and it's a very important label, so we really don't want to delete this.--Michig (talk) 08:12, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Notable record label; sources exist. I agree that we need to find a way to take a harder line against articles that still remain unreferenced after an extended period of improvement tagging, but this particular topic was never really a deletion candidate in the first place and some references have now been added. Keep. Bearcat (talk) 20:13, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:26, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep! Hundreds of great recordings, so far. Home to Joanna Newsom, Will Oldham and many more... Can we not just block the plank who nominated this for deletion? Night. Snoop God (talk) 01:08, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep. Well known label with many famous artists. This is a very pointy AFD. Leithp 07:06, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep. Rewrite if necessary, but Drag City is an important, notable label that definitely deserves a Wikipedia entry. Mark Lungo (talk) 18:42, 11 December 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.