Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Drag Strip (Transformers)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Courcelles 00:00, 18 July 2011 (UTC)

Drag Strip (Transformers)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Minor fictional character that does not appear to have any third-party significant commentary. Black Kite (t) (c) 00:29, 3 July 2011 (UTC) Black Kite (t) (c) 00:29, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep or Merge to Stunticons per WP:BEFORE #5, which should have been done by the nominator of the article. A member of a team should be merged back to the team page before he is considered for deletion. Mathewignash (talk) 01:17, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 01:40, 3 July 2011 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:10, 10 July 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep or merge to Stunticons per User:Mathewignash. J I P  &#124; Talk 07:51, 10 July 2011 (UTC)
 * delete or merge To the above keep votes, is there a policy-based reason for your recommendation? To me, no independent sources have significant coverage of this particular transformer.  It is not notable. HominidMachinae (talk) 23:38, 10 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Well, one of the toys for Drag Strip was a convention exclusive that was reported on by MTV. Sorta notable. Mathewignash (talk) 02:29, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Wonderful. make sure you write that up on the pending wikialpha page. Tarc (talk) 02:59, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - No reliably sourced coverage to support claim of notability. In-world cruft is insufficient. Tarc (talk) 02:59, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete poor sources do not justify an article.Dwanyewest (talk) 16:29, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete lack of reliable and independent sources to WP;verify notability. Shooterwalker (talk) 01:33, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete: No real evidence that this fictional character (or rather fictional characters) meets the general notability guideline. All sources in the article or found with a search engine test are either unreliable or not independent of the subject to presume that the fictional character, as a topic, deserves a stand-alone article. As with other similar articles, I do not believe that a redirect or a merge are justified for this minor character. Jfgslo (talk) 00:30, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.