Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Drago Đurić


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 21:39, 9 August 2022 (UTC)

Drago Đurić

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Somewhat generic name, but can't find proof of WP:GNG for this specific holder. All the references in the article seem to be primary sources, and many are archived. A Google Books search doesn't seem to mention him anywhere in the first few pages, a search of general Google with site:rs shows a bunch of other people. Actually found a cursory reference to his son being famous for something unrelated, but again no significant coverage of the father. Joy &#91;shallot&#93; (talk) 18:01, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators and Serbia. Joy &#91;shallot&#93; (talk) 18:01, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete. We have no evidence of passing WP:PROF, WP:AUTHOR, or anything else. His full professorship is suggestive that there might be something we're missing, and there is a language barrier, but significance in philosophy can sometimes be a bit opaque even for English-language philosophers, and we can't base an article on a vague hope of finding something. —David Eppstein (talk) 18:57, 2 August 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.