Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DragonKenpo


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Delete, consensus is that the article does not meet the notability guidelines. Davewild (talk) 19:27, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

DragonKenpo

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Reads like an original essay, not an encyclopedia article. Ecoleetage (talk) 09:37, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment there's currently two articles on this - the other one is at Dragon Kenpo which would be the correct title.  That's already listed for merge to American Kenpo discussion is at Talk:American_Kenpo.   I agree that most of the content of this one should go, but have no firm opinion on delete versus merge. -Hunting dog (talk) 12:06, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  13:03, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Minor Non-notable sub-style, 584 G-hits is not a good sign. Little useful content to merge as it is mainly an advert --Nate1481(t/c) 13:33, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Agree that the material is non-encyclopedic. Also per the discussion at the American Kenpo talk page.  Livitup (talk) 14:24, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete or redirect--nn and as a search term it'd be more likely to have a space. JJL (talk) 16:54, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete The article reads as original research. Also: "Dragon Kenpo was originally spread by Mr. Ed Hutchison as a correspondence course, students could by the tapes of Dragon Kenpo to learn at home and students received in the mail a Black Belt certificate with their tapes." McDojo by mail. jmcw (talk) 08:53, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete I agree the "style" is not notable. And the article reads too much like promotional material. Vantelimus (talk) 03:05, 29 June 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.