Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dragon Ball (film) (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete. —Wknight94 (talk) 13:11, 21 October 2007 (UTC)

Dragon Ball (film)
AfDs for this article: 
 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. Okay, we have a director. Great. We still have no actors, filming information (as required by WP:MOVIE), or release date. shoy 03:23, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep Let the article stay, When more information is released another article is just gonna have to be created. So just let it stay. DEXTERDARKLING 7:14, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as per previous deletion: There is literally no information concerning the movie other than 'It might be made at some time. Maybe.' HalfShadow 03:22, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per previous deletion; WP is NOT a Crystal Ball --Mhking 03:25, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete as recreation of deleted material TonyBallioni 16:35, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep This is a basic stub. Crystal Ball does not apply as this page isn't making any predictions. It's simply shy on content right now, as are most stubs. - perfectblue 16:49, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Sources incredibly weak. The JPS talk to me  17:00, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete This is less than a stub, non-existent sources, per WP:Crystal in particular. Pigman 17:17, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment I'm fairly sure this is the third or fourth time this has actually come up. Guys, there just isn't enough information to make an article about it yet. You don't even have enough info for a proper stub yet. HalfShadow 19:40, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete then Redirect to List of Dragon Ball films as the term is likely to be searched.-- Lenticel ( talk ) 22:24, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete as recreation of previously deleted, and not at all reliable.Folken de Fanel 22:04, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
 * keep: More information will probably be added as it becomes available...Mrmccollough 11:11, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per the notability guidelines for films, which states that a film article should be created if the film enters production. This is because the film industry does not put all announced projects into production.  There is sufficient verifiable content at Dragon Ball Z (which says that it's been in development since 2002).  Also, Articles for deletion/Dragon Ball Z (film) is a discussion of the same project (as it's been uncertain if the film will be called Dragon Ball or Dragon Ball Z).  Considering that sufficient content exists at Dragon Ball Z, this article doesn't warrant existence at all. —Erik (talk • contrib) - 02:02, 21 October 2007 (UTC)


 * To add to my recommendation, the sole citation in the AfD'd article relies on the latest news from CHUD.com, whose webmaster relies on "an old and trusted scooper named Tailgunner Joe". This so-called update is not verifiable content from a reliable source, and thus there is no accurate information about this film's impending production. —Erik (talk • contrib) - 02:19, 21 October 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete per WP:NF future films guidelines, which are completely unambiguous on the matter. Girolamo Savonarola 03:28, 21 October 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete - A stubby article based on a scooper report? Fails WP:NF, WP:RS, WP:CRYSTAL...the list goes on, but I think my point is obvious.   BIGNOLE     (Contact me)  04:11, 21 October 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.