Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dragon Ball Collectible Card Game


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__ to delete. Discussions to stubify, rename or redirect can continue on the respective talk pages. (non-admin closure) Alpha3031 (t • c) 15:17, 31 May 2023 (UTC)

Dragon Ball Collectible Card Game

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

No evidence of notability. The article just relies on primary sources and commercial links. Xexerss (talk) 05:35, 5 May 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 01:00, 13 May 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Arbitrarily0   ( talk ) 10:16, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Anime and manga and Japan.Xexerss (talk) 05:35, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:58, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Dragon Ball per nom; this page is solely based on primary sources and has a ton of fancruft. Link20XX (talk) 23:55, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep/rename This article appears to cover both the 2008 game and the 2017 game ("Dragon Ball Super Card game") which is apparently basically a revision to the 2008 game?  Dragon Ball Super Card Game appears to be notable.  There is what appears to be an independent book (, and a fair bit of coverage by relevant fan sites (, [(,,  including reviews . I'm no subject expert, but it looks like the 2017 game is notable and it makes sense to also have some coverage of the 2008 game.  That said, the current article has lots of problems and could stand to be hugely trimmed. Hobit (talk) 21:57, 7 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Weak keep or redirect. There is something notable here, I hope, but given the current woeful state of this (terrible referencing), WP:TNT is frankly an option too. and  suggest that the topic of Dragon Ball card games may be notable, and such an article can indeed discuss various games from that franchise (there is also Dragon Ball Z Collectible Card Game which looks only a little bit better...). The current article could redirect there. But such an article does not exist yet. A redirect target to consider could be Dragon_Ball. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here  01:16, 10 May 2023 (UTC) PS. I'll ping some editors that may be interested in this: User:Mindmatrix, User:Bermicourt, User:BOZ, User:VickKiang. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here  01:22, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Also @Leitmotiv Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 01:24, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Weak keep - There are likely many articles available for citing as this is a popular series. It needs a lot of TLC, or as Piotr said, some TNT. Strong oppose to redirect. Leitmotiv (talk) 23:53, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.