Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dragon Ball FO


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was d e lete, the temperature's dropping fast in here. east. 718 at 19:52, January 4, 2008

Dragon Ball FO

 * – (View AfD) (View log)


 * Delete - Original reserch for a possible Manga cartoon that has cited the name of Kakusho Sitori which does not come up with any hits. There is no citation or reference to an interview which apparently confirms that this anime will be created at the end of 2008.  The whole article is completely against WP:CRYSTAL.  If this Manga cartoon really is going to exist it should be created in the Dragon Ball (franchise) first and with proper WP:V. Pmedema (talk) 20:58, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Kakusho Sitori is not a writer, he works at Bird Studios. And it was on a Japanese TV channel, so its currently very hard to get correct references. In a few days, it should be everywhere on the net because of Dragonballs massive fanbase. DrVonDre (talk)
 * Then dont worry, we will recreate the article then.   U z EE   (Talk • Contribs) 21:18, 2 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete Per WP:NOR, as it fails to cite any sources at all. Although it would be exciting if it turns to be true.   U z EE   (Talk • Contribs) 21:18, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Well, I thought Wikipedia enjoyed being the first with such info... Give it a month. It will be EVERYWHERE when you search Google. -DrVonDre —Preceding unsigned comment added by DrVonDre (talk • contribs) 21:21, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Then I suggest that you read WP:NOR and WP:CITE before any further contribuion.   U z EE   (Talk • Contribs) 21:45, 2 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete I wanted to say "Merge" but since a Google search revealed nothing, It's not even worth a redirect barring a verifiable source. -Verdatum (talk) 21:33, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete not sourced at all. Plus, it really is rabbit season. JuJube (talk) 00:51, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions.   —Quasirandom (talk) 15:00, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete until a published third-party source is found to verify the content. --Farix (Talk) 15:07, 3 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions.  -- Hiding T 15:32, 3 January 2008 (UTC)


 * But this is from reliable sources, like Japanese tv. Ask every japanese anime fan, and they can verify this! Besides, why would Toriyamas assistent talk about a series that dont exist? If you let this stay open, it will be noticed and someone will bring up the evidence. I am already fighting a hard fight to get the name of the channel on LimiWire and stuff, because im a DBZ fanatic. —Preceding unsigned comment added by DrVonDre (talk • contribs) 18:44, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment The problem is that you are referring to "some interview on Japanese TV",' however, you have not specified the time, date, channel, or program the interview was conducted. That is like adding information to an article based on "some book" without giving the title of the book, when the book was written, or the author the book. "Some interview" simply can't be taken as a reliable source. --Farix (Talk) 19:00, 3 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete - WP:HOAX until sources can be provided to verify its content. Sephiroth BCR  ( Converse ) 20:56, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:CRYSTAL and possible WP:HOAX due to complete lack of reliable sources and the series not actually appearing. If/When its released and actually is noted in a reliable source (like ANN), no prejudice for recreation. Collectonian (talk) 22:01, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment I would have to agree, if this had any real merit, ANN would have reported it by now. --Farix (Talk) 01:55, 4 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete per Sephiroth BCR. (Duane543 (talk) 23:30, 3 January 2008 (UTC))
 * Delete this now. DesireCampbell (talk) 02:43, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
 * This deletion is maximum. Any announcement of further Dragon Ball would be a major anime-media event; chalk up another wannabe wiki-hoax. Papacha (talk) 06:08, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

Don't delete This is true, and i finally got the proofs from one who edited the page... The true guy who got interviewed was Yamada Tarō, search and see the truth! —Preceding unsigned comment added by DrVonDre (talk • contribs)


 * Comment Swearing up and down that it is true isn't helping your case. We need solid proof and you so far haven't provided it. --Farix (Talk) 11:28, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment People made similar claims regarding Dragon Ball AF, but to date I have never seen anything on that. It might be that someone supplied you with false info.   U z EE   (Talk • Contribs) 11:59, 4 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete, I did a search for "Yamada Tarō" and "Dragon Ball FO" and got nothing. I suspect this might be WP:BOLLOCKS, or at least a WP:HOAX.  Even if not, there are no secondary sources and it looks awfully WP:CRYSTAL.  Sorry for all the acronyms.  Lankiveil (talk) 12:00, 4 January 2008 (UTC).
 * Delete, per above. Simply unverifiable. -- RattleMan 12:34, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per all comments above. Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 14:19, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Farix and Papacha are right--if this had even a shadow of a substance, the anime news outlets would be All Over It, and I'm not seeing a twitch. Without anything to more substantiate it, the subject is unverified. —Quasirandom (talk) 14:56, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - Let it snow... Jauerback (talk) 15:29, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Note Yamada Tarou is the Japanese equivalent of John Doe. JuJube (talk) 18:02, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Weak delete. Let's write the article when there's more there. --Gwern (contribs) 19:46 4 January 2008 (GMT)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.