Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dragon Court (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to History of China. Black Kite 00:06, 16 November 2009 (UTC)

Dragon Court
AfDs for this article: 
 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Previously deleted via AFD in 2006 and prodded in June 2007 with the concern: "Article does not explain how this game might be notable (WP:N), or provide any independent references (WP:V), and is almost entirely game guide material (WP:NOT)". Concerns raised in prod and previous AFD discussion are still valid: the article still consists of game guide and promotional material with no independent sources to establish notability. The only coverage I can find in reliable sources is a mention in a Press of Atlantic City article (link), but it's debatable whether this is sufficient to satisfy WP:N. Muchness (talk) 03:43, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. A mere mention in PoAC does not connote notability, and the sources don't convey anything.  -- Dennis The Tiger   (Rawr and stuff) 03:57, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete and redirect per the PROD reasoning, it was redirected to History of China, so it should be deleted to remove the current content, and a redirect be created and fully protected to History of China as a reasonable alternate term for the Court of the Dragon Throne. 65.94.252.195 (talk) 07:47, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. MrKIA11 (talk) 13:46, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Redirect to History of China. The subject is not notable, and so the redirect should remain in place. Protection is too extreme at this point; if editors continue to remove the redirect, it can be discussed then. Heavyweight Gamer (talk) 22:22, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.