Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dragon Quest X


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merge to Dragon Quest. Stifle (talk) 10:54, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

Dragon Quest X

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Topic that has little information and no reason to be a standalone article. Should be either deleted or merged into Dragon Quest as per article criteria. Jonathan Hardin&#39; (talk) 15:32, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Merge per the concerns by Jonathan Hardin. If we have enough information as development progresses, we will restore this article. Darth Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 15:38, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Weak Merge + redirect Previous merge discussion occured about 2 years ago shortley after announcement, that did have consensus to stay the status quo. Essentially though since then nothing has emerged from the game except rumours and crystal balling. In fact the original annoucnment and the basis for the article is essentially that the game is planned to be out for the wii, when and if it will happen is still unknown and still with uncertainty. I dont think deletion is entirely prudent, but i do think the material from the page would be best suited on the main series page rather than its own stand alone article for this time. Ottawa4ever (talk) 16:19, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 20:55, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:55, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Merge - Doesn't have enough content to keep separate. Examples of good unreleased games would be Kingdom Hearts III and Kirby (2011 video game). Mario Kart 3DS barely has enough to warrant a split article, but has a better chance then this one. All the sources are years old, and there is no indication that more will appear other then "We want this game to come out" stuff. Blake (Talk·Edits) 03:18, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.