Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dragon Wharf


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) Spirit of Eagle (talk) 04:07, 17 February 2015 (UTC)

Dragon Wharf

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Unsourced, and does not have supported claim of notability of subject. smileguy91talk 03:37, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Vietnam-related deletion discussions. N ORTH A MERICA 1000 12:59, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:27, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:27, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Museums and libraries-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:27, 11 February 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep. The article now has external links to English and Vietnamese information on the museum. The corresponding Vietnamese article shows it is a major attraction and a historically important site. Yngvadottir (talk) 19:13, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep. Does seem to be notable. -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:02, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep The corresponding article on Vietnamese wikipedia is sourced, and it has a claim to WP:GEOFEAT.--Antigng (talk) 02:17, 13 February 2015 (UTC)


 * Speedy Merge and Redirect - if this is about the museum (as it says it is) we already have that article at Ho Chi Minh Museum. Am I missing something? --&mdash;  Rhododendrites talk  \\ 04:52, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
 * There are several Ho Chi Minh Museums. Maybe Ho Chi Minh Museum should be moved to Ho Chi Minh Museum (Hanoi).--Antigng (talk) 06:33, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Ah! Yes. It would appear I am a fool. :) Thanks for pointing this out. !Vote struck above accordingly. --&mdash;  Rhododendrites talk  \\ 13:49, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.