Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dragon facts


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Dragon. This article does not add anything that isn't already covered there. It's a not-unplausible redirect term, so I elect not to delete the article outright under CSD criterion A10. —C.Fred (talk) 01:51, 1 May 2010 (UTC)

Dragon facts

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

This only contains non-encyclopedic material. Décembër21st2012Freâk  Talk at 00:47, 1 May 2010 (UTC)

Have you looked at all of the other pages? This actually has information that you can use. It can give you ideas for art, it can help you on a homework assignment, etc. I can&#39;t think of another user name (talk) 00:58, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia is not a learning site (see the bottom section which says "Now it is time to learn about the various breath weapons."). It also says "Let's get started" in the beginning of the article, and other articles don't say that. The "Dragon Anatomy" section also looks like your making someone learn something. Also, dragons are made-up and not real. Décembër21st2012Freâk   Talk at 01:14, 1 May 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete: The only citation links to a Quizlet page, which has no verifiability. It's hard to verify something like this. Additionally, I would say that Dragon covers this subject pretty well. Delete, as it isn't verifiable and seems to have a lot of original research. GorillaWarfare  talk 01:23, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.