Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dragon kumai transformation x


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete AdamBiswanger1 04:50, 10 October 2006 (UTC)

Dragon kumai transformation x
Context-free article with no assertion of notability. What is it? -- RHaworth 02:38, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong delete per nom. MER-C 02:46, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Google and Yahoo render nil results. Looks like an odd made-up card game with an odd made-up background story.-- Hús  ö  nd  03:38, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, no context, fancruft, the game may or may not be non-notable. J I P  | Talk 05:42, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. --Maelnuneb (Talk) 17:47, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Shame that someone has spent so much time typing all that in...  QuiteUnusual 17:57, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - agree with all the above Blowmonkey 19:16, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Per nom. · XP  · 21:02, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete "Dragon Kumai Transformation X (DKTX) is an online ccg created by Jack Faust. It is not completed yet. It will be an online game in which you can battle against other people online and change your deck." Wikipedia is not a crystal ball, and zero Google hits seals the deal. -Elmer Clark 23:25, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Subject is not notable but its about Breath of Fire for those concerned. Reads too much like a strategy guide with the deck listing in it as well. --NuclearZer0 15:28, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete I've read the crystal ball entry, and must agree on it's deletion, although it's not about breath of fire. --Jack Faust 21:07, 7 October 2006
 * Delete unverifiable, noncontextual, and WIN an instruction manual, etc. etc.  Tewfik Talk 01:20, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.