Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dragonball: 2 Reborn


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Delete, fails WP:V and  WP:CRYSTAL. While there is a rumor about a sequel, nothing can be verified by reliable sources at this time. Dreadstar ☥  04:55, 27 June 2010 (UTC)

Dragonball 2: Reborn

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

I've not been able to find any announcements that the film and what information I could find was either rumors or speculation from blogs and forum posts. Completely fails WP:V and is possibility a hoax. The original article was a copy and paste of Dragonball Evolution, which I've removed along with unsourced information about casting before nominating this article. (WP:BLP) —Farix (t &#124; c) 23:51, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions.  -- —Farix (t &#124; c) 23:51, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  -- —Farix (t &#124; c) 23:52, 21 June 2010 (UTC)


 * Strong Delete per above, as pointed out in the original prod There are no reliable sources to prove production or filming of this film. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 23:58, 21 June 2010 (UTC)


 * Strong delete As unconfirmed rumor/hoax. -- AnmaFinotera  (talk · contribs) 00:06, 22 June 2010 (UTC)


 * Comment I would like to note that dragonballrebornmovie.com is currently registered to a cyper-squatter. On the other hand dragonballreborn.com doesn't appear to be registered. If the film is in production, than FOX would have acquired one of these domans by now. —Farix (t &#124; c) 00:40, 22 June 2010 (UTC)


 * So speedy delete this as a hoax? - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 00:52, 22 June 2010 (UTC)


 * It's a very real rumor that's been floating around the internet since before the first film was released. So I don't know if the article would qualify for speedy deletion. —Farix (t &#124; c) 00:55, 22 June 2010 (UTC)


 * Rewrote the lead so that much is verifiable. —Farix (t &#124; c) 02:02, 22 June 2010 (UTC)


 * Strong Delete - this article is seriously a hoax, doesn't have any sources per WP:V and Wikipedia is not a rumour mill or a crystal ball for that matter. Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 01:11, 22 June 2010 (UTC)


 * If the rumor gets more steam and reportage, then maybe then, but the guideline says not until production has confirmed to have started. For now, things aren't there yet: delete. —Quasirandom (talk) 04:01, 22 June 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete No reliable sources to prove filming has begun or that the film is even in development. - kollision (talk) 08:57, 22 June 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete Someone copied information from the Dragonball Evolution article. The links to reviews are for Evolution.   D r e a m Focus  20:11, 22 June 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete per WP:CRYSTAL. No reliable sources to suggest filming has begun. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 11:40, 24 June 2010 (UTC)


 * Note: Cut and paste move fixed, article is now at what IMDb gives as the title, and two AfD's consolidated. One comment was on the other one, which is as follows:


 * Looks like someone began the AfD for this article but never actually finished it. Anyway, I'll have to go with weak incubation because although there seems to be a lot of sources about this movie being in development, they're all forums. In addition, the IMDb page doesn't even have a cast listing. Erpert (let's talk about it) 07:18, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
 * I highly disapprove of the move of the article and AfD to "Dragonball 2: Reborn" as there is no official title and "Dragonball: 2 Reborn" is/was the original name of the article up for deletion. The IMDB listing is apparently part of the ongoing hoax/rumor. Also, the list was completed, as shown by this edit. Apparently, someone must have removed it from the day's log. —Farix (t &#124; c) 03:27, 27 June 2010 (UTC)

Thanks. Courcelles (talk) 02:47, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete, rumour/hoax. Forum posts are so far from being reliable sources that I would even oppose incubation or userification on this.  Lankiveil (speak to me) 03:20, 27 June 2010 (UTC).
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.