Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dragons of Atlantis


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Kabam. Unanimous consensus shows it shouldn't be kept as a standalone article; however it's a possible search term and a valid redirect. Any content that someone wants to merge into Kabam can be salvaged in the article's history. :) · Salvidrim!  ·  &#9993;  07:34, 2 February 2013 (UTC)

Dragons of Atlantis

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable game. PROD denied. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:44, 26 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete - It appears to just be a little browser game like million others. It has no serious sources or results in Google Books. EternalFlare (talk) 09:13, 26 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Kabam. I tried to save this while it was being PRODed, but was unable to find enough coverage to merit it being kept. This could potentially be redirected to Kabam, as they own the game, but it doesn't pass notability guidelines from what I could find. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   12:21, 26 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 15:29, 29 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:29, 29 January 2013 (UTC)


 * weak keep sources clearly meet GNG. A merge to Kabam might be a better organizational move though. Hobit (talk) 13:53, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.