Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dragons of Darkness


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Orson Scott Card bibliography. Nothing sourced to merge. No prejudice against spinning out separate articles, as long as they're reliably sourced. czar 00:21, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

Dragons of Darkness

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

not notable Rathfelder (talk) 15:03, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. Mark the trainDiscuss 17:38, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. --Animalparty! (talk) 02:59, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * I'm tempted to say Merge to Card's bibliography, but there's no other text there. I'm undecided, but making a spinout article of Card's anthologies, and merging this and its peers there, seems like a reasonable approach. Jclemens (talk) 03:20, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  A  Train talk 07:57, 16 October 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:11, 23 October 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Comment I like the idea of merging these to a new Anthologies edited by Orson Scott Card page, though having so many infoboxes and tables interleaved will likely cause formatting issues. power~enwiki ( π, ν ) 21:05, 24 October 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kagundu  Talk To Me  05:13, 31 October 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.