Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dragonworks


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was  d elete. - Mailer Diablo 04:14, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

Dragonworks

 * - (View AfD) (View log)

Misses WP:CORP significantly and will probably run into problems with several other software developers named "Dragonworks". Website appears to be here; products promoted in the article are in various states of development and unreleased. I can't see any other notable releases nor could I find any external references or media mentions. Article was only recently rewritten to be quite as G11 as it is. Contested prod. Kuru talk  02:39, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NOT, please do not post ads on Wikipedia. --Daniel J. Leivick 02:45, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. No independent sources at all. No evidence of notability. The assertion of notability is based on speculative claims about future products. See WP:CRYSTAL. --Shirahadasha 02:48, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Per Kuru. Somitho 10:32, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Seems to fail WP:CORP by some way, but google searches are compromised by a large number of hits for other entities with the same name. The forum on the company web site has only a small number of posts (under 150 in  a year) suggesting a general lack of interest in this comapny & its products.   Mr Stephen 12:35, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete on WP:N grounds alone. "We hope to be notable in the future" isn't grounds for an entry today. JCO312 15:43, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as being non notable, at the moment. No amount of arguing about potential can change the fact that something is non-notable. J Milburn 17:13, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as crystal balling, no sources, less time adding advertisement-language to WP and more time developing games would be for the benefit. Small groups can and do produce games which garner both sales and recognition, but this company is so early in its life-cycle it hasn't even constructed its 'about us' page yet. Says it all. QuagmireDog 21:04, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - A great example of an advertising piece. .V. -- (TalkEmail)  06:12, 25 January 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.