Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dragoslav Đukanović


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 23:34, 26 May 2021 (UTC)

Dragoslav Đukanović

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Fails WP:GNG. The article is so non-notable that it was deleted on the Serbian Wikipedia. Paul Vaurie (talk) 16:18, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment It seems like the srwiki (Serbian Wikipedia) article was deleted in 2010. I can't find the deletion discussion at srwiki   shwiki (Serbo-Croatian Wikipedia) never had an article:   ‎⠀Trimton⠀‎‎  00:29, 20 May 2021 (UTC)


 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Paul Vaurie (talk) 16:18, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Serbia-related deletion discussions. Paul Vaurie (talk) 16:18, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:36, 19 May 2021 (UTC)


 * Weak Delete. Failing GNG doesnt mean deletion if Đukanović meets WP:PROF. The only WP:SIGCOV I can locate with google search, google scholar, google news, and google books is, the website of his university. It's quite promotional and lists lots of scientific organisations Đukanović is purportedly a member of. Those organisations usually have very bad or dead websites. On none of the 3 our 4 I checked did I find his name. The subject of this article seems like someone who might warrant SIGCOV (with purportedly all those books published and international scientific association work done) but didn't get this sigcov in online sources. So I see two ways an editor with Serbian(/Serbo-Croatian) language skills could help here: 1) find WP:RSeliable offline sources and cite them 2) The page I linked also states that Đukanović is part of some Serbian national academy group. Perhaps he was made a fellow of a highly selective academy or won some prestigious award, which would mean inclusion under WP:PROF. ‎⠀Trimton⠀‎‎  00:29, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete. Scopus has him on 22 articles with a grand total of 1 citation. Not seeing how he meets NPROF here. JoelleJay (talk) 02:29, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment Serbian Wiki equivalent is at sr:Нацрт:Dragoslav_Đukanović, i.e. in draft space, where it lingers since 2010. It presents an enormous academical output (and is likely a copy of the professor's CV). On a quick skim, I can't find much international journals among lot of chaff; IDJ is open access and has impact factor of 2.038. No such user (talk) 08:36, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Thanks for digging it up, wow what a draft.... ‎⠀Trimton⠀‎‎  16:34, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete. Output on Google scholar does not seem so noteworthy in of its own right to warrant inclusion. Daiaespera (talk) 13:05, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Daiaespera has been blocked as a sockpuppet. —David Eppstein (talk) 01:34, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete. There's a physicist with a similar name on Daiaespera's Google Scholar link, whose citation counts, while stronger, are still not enough to convince me of a pass of WP:PROF. I did at least learn from the search that we should be searching for Djukanovic as well as Dukanovic. Regardless, there's not enough there for WP:PROF, and the academic leadership positions described by the article also do not rise to the level of automatic notability. —David Eppstein (talk) 01:34, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete. doesnt pass WP:NPROF. --hroest 00:19, 26 May 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.