Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Draino in pipes


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was  d elete. - Mailer Diablo 18:29, 16 October 2007 (UTC)

Draino in pipes

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Protologism 2.0. Wikipedia is not for snappy acronyms one day. 1 ghit. MER-C 09:32, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Article is unsourced, and offers no hint of being a widespread or important concept. Term is too recent to have gained any form of reasonable notability. Sjakkalle (Check!)  09:36, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete If it's a recent neologism, delete it. To me, it has a hoax-y sound, like someone saw Ruby on Rails and tried to mimic. In any event, no refs, no external sources, delete. Yngvarr (t) (c) 11:00, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, sole GHIT is an Engadget post linking back to the article. Reads like a parody of ajax (programming) to me. Fails WP:V let alone anything else. --Dhartung | Talk 11:15, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete -- looks like nonsense. "PHP imbedded (sic) Perl" especially doesn't make sense, since most Web designers would pick either PHP or Perl, not try to imbed (sic) one inside the other.  --Elkman (Elkspeak) 15:00, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. No sources, and the product is actually spelled Drano. Possibility of a hoax. No Google results independent of Wikipedia. EdJohnston 01:36, 13 October 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.