Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Drake Caggiula


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure)  Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk)  02:36, 20 June 2016 (UTC)

Drake Caggiula

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

fails WP:NHOCKEY Joeykai (talk) 04:51, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 07:13, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 07:13, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 07:13, 24 May 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete: Undrafted college player of no particular accomplishments, the article doesn't merely falsely assert that the subject plays for the Edmonton Oilers, he was never drafted. Fails WP:NHOCKEY, no evidence he meets the GNG beyond routine sports coverage explicitly debarred by WP:ROUTINE.  Article created by User talk:Drizzy85, whose talk page is studded by several dozen notifications of CSDs, prodding and AfDs of a raft of unreferenced one-sentence sub-stub creations.   Ravenswing   09:50, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep - Although he was not drafted and has not yet played for Edmonton, he became a star his senior year, won the Frozen Four MVP award and has received significant coverage, far more than routine coverage that would typically attach to a run of the mill free agent signing. For example        .  There is also  this which admittedly is not secondary coverage, but ncaa.com doesn't do features on just any college athlete.  And an interview here.  And lots of more minor coverage from various places.  Obviously the article needs improvement though. Rlendog (talk) 14:22, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep - I agree with Rlendog - meets the GNG. -- Hockeyben (talk - contribs) 13:57, 29 May 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, st170e talk 17:57, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:45, 1 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete fast Samat lib (talk) 21:58, 5 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Is there a reason? Rlendog (talk) 23:22, 5 June 2016 (UTC)
 * See also WP:JUSTAVOTE. North America1000 00:46, 16 June 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, st170e talk 01:29, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep He obviously fails WP:NHOCKEY, it looks as though there is just enough for a WP:GNG pass based on three of the articles listed above numbered 1,2 and 7; all of the other articles are just routine in nature. Deadman137 (talk) 19:05, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Draft instead as a compromise as there are still questionable signs for this article as its own and although there are apparent awarding achievements and such, the current article still insinuates nothing to currently accept and improve. SwisterTwister   talk  18:08, 16 June 2016 (UTC)

 References
 * Keep – The subject meets WP:BASIC. Source examples include, but are not limited to those listed below. These sources provide significant coverage about the subject well beyond routine-style sports coverage. North America1000 21:50, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
 * The Sports Network
 * The Sports Network
 * CBC.ca
 * Vancouver Sun


 * Keep as a WP:GNG pass, per Rlendog's sources. Ejgreen77 (talk) 06:17, 19 June 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.