Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dramadigit


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. ff m  18:00, 16 October 2008 (UTC)

Dramadigit

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Nonnotable someone's neologism. No evidence of active usage. The article of the same author and quality as the one discussed in Articles for deletion/Num. `'Míkka>t 16:14, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep google search reveals many references missing from article Dagordon01 (talk) 21:54, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Looking at them, they all appear to be citing the same portion of the same single book by Dewdney. Uncle G (talk) 09:55, 13 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete. This neologism has not appeared in any published sources other than the original book (except for a handful of websites). --Itub (talk) 10:55, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - NN neologism. AlexTiefling (talk) 15:54, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete The book cited in the article was published in 1993. If this term were notable, then at least one other published source would have used it in the last 15 years. --Megaboz (talk) 21:19, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Agree with the deletion arguments; this seems to be a pet term of a single author, rather than a widely-established term. &mdash; Carl (CBM · talk) 13:06, 16 October 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.