Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Draseleq

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was DELETE. jni 19:13, 11 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Draseleq
Advertisment, no real content--nixie 10:04, 4 Mar 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
 * Delete No evidence of notability. -- Infrogmation 18:11, 4 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Any notable references? Zzyzx11 18:54, 4 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, not notable. Megan1967 23:24, 4 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. I've actually heard of this, but it is just one person's private conlang, with no following.   &mdash; Gwalla | Talk 03:18, 5 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * My Favourite Toy Conlang. Delete - David Gerard 12:49, 9 Mar 2005 (UTC)