Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dream (YouTuber) (3rd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Frivolous nomination that offers no new arguments that were not discussed in the previous AfD. (non-admin closure) ZXCVBNM (TALK) 18:40, 2 September 2021 (UTC)

Dream_(YouTuber)
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log )

Not notable outside of Minecraft YouTube Amillionmonkeys (talk) 15:48, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2021 September 2.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 15:59, 2 September 2021 (UTC)


 * Strong keep: Did you even take a look at all of the sources within the article to verify the notability? He's clearly notable outside of YouTube, and even if he wasn't but sources were still provided, he'd still be notable. Waddles 🗩 🖉 16:13, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. — hueman1 ( talk  •  contributions ) 16:22, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. — hueman1 ( talk  •  contributions ) 16:22, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. — hueman1 ( talk  •  contributions ) 16:22, 2 September 2021 (UTC)


 * Speedy keep per WP:CSK #3. With all due respect I don't see how you can read the  references and not see how it meets WP:GNG and WP:ANYBIO with flying colors. Multiple reliable independent sources, as well as winning a Streamy Award in 2020. Qwaiiplayer (talk) 16:28, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
 * 🧦 because sus. User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk)  16:36, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep obviously. The cheating controversy *alone* is notable, never mind the rest of his carreer. Also, It's a little difficult to assume good faith when a completely new account proposes a popular streamer's article for deletion during their first day of editing. ApLundell (talk) 17:21, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep: Article easily passes WP:ENT. The analyses done by Nsk92, MJL and ImaginesTigers in the previous discussion still apply. ASTIG😎  (ICE T • ICE CUBE) 18:30, 2 September 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.