Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dream Empire Music


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Thank you fo the source analysis of which no editor has posted a rebuttal. Liz Read! Talk! 03:53, 11 April 2024 (UTC)

Dream Empire Music

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Non-notable record label which fails WP:ORGCRIT, WP:GNG or any applicable SNG. Could not find sources to establish, at the very least, GNG. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 12:20, 28 March 2024 (UTC) --Vanderwaalforces (talk) 22:56, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music, Entertainment, Organizations,  and Nigeria. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 12:20, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  20:48, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Comment The label doesn't meet WP:MUSIC's sense of an important indie label, but the article does have several sources from potentially reliable Nigerian outlets, which suggests a possible GNG pass. A source analysis might be valuable here. Chubbles (talk) 16:21, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
 * I will gladly provide a source analysis, I have the plan already. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 17:26, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Simply case of WP:LOTSOFSOURCES. All the Best!  Otuọcha   (talk) 16:41, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
 * It certainly was not that. Chubbles (talk) 03:37, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Source assessment for sources currently on the article is below, BEFORE provides nothing but WP:ROUTINE and PR too.
 * Delete: Inherent notability. Promotional clauses and unlike a notable label; few songs and artists to credit and neither have been seen on "Top stories" (of release or SIGCOV). All the Best!  Otuọcha   (talk) 16:39, 30 March 2024 (UTC)


 * Thanks for this assessment. @Vanderwaalforces. All the Best!  Otuọcha   (talk) 16:40, 30 March 2024 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  14:08, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep The label has released two notable projects and would still need better sourcing, aside entering a joint partnership with EMPIRE.--Afí-afeti (talk) 06:06, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete per the very thorough source analysis above, thank you @Vanderwaalforces BrigadierG (talk) 16:45, 4 April 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.