Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dreamhouse (band)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. v/r - TP 00:53, 13 September 2011 (UTC)

Dreamhouse (band)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Non-notable Pesky  ( talk  …stalk!) 05:57, 30 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  —Tom Morris (talk) 06:53, 30 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete as copyright violation from the Allmusic listing. NawlinWiki (talk) 21:18, 30 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep. The only coverage I can come up with - besides the two Allmusic references already in the band's article - is this Billboard write-up. Additionally, one of the group's songs charted in the UK, so I've added these bits of information and reworded the parts of the article that were copied from the Allmusic bio. I believe there's just enough material, then, to satisfy WP:BAND.  Gongshow  Talk 06:12, 3 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:03, 6 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete Doesn't appear to be that notable. Did a search and nothing confirms notability. KING OF WIKIPEDIA - GRIM LITTLEZ (talk) 00:04, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep - notable according to WP:MUSIC, sources are cited, and the copyright violation has been removed. Peter E. James (talk) 23:31, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.