Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dreamlinux


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was no consensus. - Mailer Diablo 14:15, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

Dreamlinux
no assertion of notability and is clearly and advert for a flavour of Linux. Doesn't appear notable per WP:WEB Spartaz 18:57, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
 * WP:WEB does not apply, since it is software not a website. Tobias Conradi (Talk) 09:42, 15 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete As nom --Spartaz 18:58, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, not notable. Gazpacho 19:18, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
 * it's 86 on distrowatch down from 67. The top 100 should be in WP too. Tobias Conradi (Talk) 09:41, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Category:Debian-based_distributions contains articles that are not on distrowatch.com startpage -> not top 100. Tobias Conradi (Talk) 09:47, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
 * keep and improve. I already did some work, will try to do more. Tobias Conradi (Talk) 09:41, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep and improve. WP:WEB is not the appropriate criterion to invoke. The article describes an operating system. Moreover, seemingly one of few distros to exclusively use XFCE as their desktop environment, and possibly the foremost in terms of implementing features of OS X. The article does, however, need much more detail, especially on what elements were taken from each of the parent distros (Kanotix, Elive, Morphix, Debian). I also don't find it sounds like an advert, although I would suggest avoiding "boast", and quotes should be in quotation marks. We have an editor volunteering to work on this, so all seems good. - User:Samsara (talk • contribs) 14:53, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep and improve. The article is still a stub. Not the most popular distro, but still a distro that with contributions can be improved to great quality. -- ZeWrestler  Talk 21:08, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep and improve. WP:WEB can't apply here, as the article is describing a piece of software, and I believe that the top 100 operating systems based on Linux should be written about. T. Moitie [ talk ] 21:40, 15 August 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.