Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dreams for Kids (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Spartaz Humbug! 06:33, 18 June 2020 (UTC)

Dreams for Kids
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Does not meet WP:ORGCRITE. Let's go through the sources:
 * 1) paywalled journal article that appears unrelated to the subject matter.
 * 2), Q&A interview with the subject's founder, not independent
 * 3) IMO the best source of those provided, but as an article in a local paper about an event jointly hosted by the subject, it falls short of significant coverage
 * 4) Another journal article that appears to be totally unrelated to the subject. This one isn't paywalled, and I wasn't able to find any mention of the subject on the cited pages.
 * 5) The title of this piece is promising, but the content is another threadbare interview. Not significant coverage
 * 6) Does not look like a reliable source
 * 7) Forbes contributor, not reliable
 * 8) A well-written article, but the publisher looks like a PR firm.
 * 9) Not a secondary source
 * 10) Not independent
 * 11) Not independent
 * 12) Not independent

When searching online, I was able to find some trivial coverage but nothing that would push the subject toward meeting notability guidelines. Somewhat complicating matters, there appear to be other organizations by this name, such as this one. signed,Rosguill talk 23:59, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. signed,Rosguill talk 23:59, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. signed,Rosguill talk 23:59, 10 June 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.