Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dreamtime Village


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep, with no prejudice against a future merge proposal if the article proves unexpandable. – filelakeshoe (t / c) 🐱 09:05, 17 September 2021 (UTC)

Dreamtime Village

 * – ( View AfD View log )

I don't think this is a very notable place. The only RS discussing this place is the one NYT article linked here and the Isthmus article. wizzito &#124; say hello!  05:18, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. wizzito  &#124; say hello!  05:18, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. wizzito  &#124; say hello!  05:18, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Wisconsin-related deletion discussions. wizzito  &#124; say hello!  05:18, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. Netherzone (talk) 15:31, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions. Netherzone (talk) 15:31, 9 September 2021 (UTC)


 * Merge to West Lima, Wisconsin. I buy that it's not independently notable, but since there are some RS, it can be merged. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 07:50, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep. I think it is independently notable, now that the New York Times reference has been added. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 10:52, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep - This is really more of a collective/collaborative social experiment than a geographic settlement. (Maybe the categorization needs adjusting?) I have improved the article, adding several citations SIGCOV in reliable sources. Also added a section on the publishing house they ran/run. They are the subject of several in-depth articles in newspapers and journals, and their mail art publications are in the collections of the Smithsonian Archives of American Art, MoMA, and the Minneapolis Museum of Art. The article meets notability of GNG, and can be further improved. It should be retained in the encyclopedia. Netherzone (talk) 15:28, 9 September 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.