Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dree Hemingway


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn by nominator (non-admin closure) Mkativerata (talk) 23:17, 1 April 2010 (UTC)

Dree Hemingway

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Hemingway does not meet the notability requirements of [WP:BIO. To be notable, she would have to be the subject of "significant coverage in reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject. She features in only a few news articles in a Google news search, and most general Google hits are trivial (blogs, advertising, etc) or articles mention her in passing, rather than having her as the subject of the coverage, as required by the guideline.  Incidently, being the great-grandaughter of Ernest Hemingway is not relevant, as notability is not inherited.  Further (and importantly) a biography of a living person requires strict verification (this article has only two references). Wikipeterproject (talk) 15:11, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This article has been nominated for rescue. Silver  seren C 08:43, 28 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Comment I have tagged this article for rescue. Silver  seren C 08:43, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep I suppose you must have been using some other Google news search, as I found a number of articles from primary sources that were entirely about her. I added them into the article. Silver  seren C 08:43, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:10, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:10, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep Over a hundred results in Google news search. One news source calls her the model of the moment.   D r e a m Focus  16:41, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep GNews establishes notability for me -- there's fairly substantial coverage in a number of reliable publications. ɠǀɳ̩ςεΝɡ  bomb  17:52, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep -  There seems to be significant coverage.  Someone just needs to take the time to put what's in the coverage into the article.  Dismas |(talk) 21:06, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Withdraw. The article needs a huge amount of work, but I think notability has been established with some of the additional sources.  As nominator, I withdraw the nomination for deletion.  Wikipeterproject (talk) 01:43, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.