Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dreem Records


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies.  So Why  06:31, 11 August 2017 (UTC)

Dreem Records

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable company. A minor record label of the late 50s/early 60s that (after its owners gave up and went on to other careers) was reformed by one of the founders as some unclear form of music licensing service. No significant coverage of either entity to be found. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 14:05, 26 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Comment please see the talk page discussion. In my estimation there is quite a bit of collector interest in this label, so it is a useful topic from an "specialized encyclopedia" standpoint.  There's probably some articles in obscure record collecting rags that I'll never see in my lifetime.  All the online sources I could find are listed on the talk page, except for numerous message board postings.  Article was created to promote the "re-formed" online music licencing company, which is utterly non-notable by any viewpoint I can think of.  For a record collector, there are merely two pieces of useful information in the current article.  1st is the name of the founders (probably verifiable by the Billboard article and the Galen Gart independent labels book (which I don't have handy at the moment)), and the recording and pressing locations, which probably fail WP:V.    78.26   (spin me / revolutions) 14:48, 26 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:58, 26 July 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:23, 2 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete Only thing I could find about the label was this:, it says on this website they released one album for a reasonably notable band, the Berry Brothers (every other band or performer listed are very obscure), but just releasing non-notable album or single (sources vary) for a vaugely notable band in the late 50s doesn't give notability in my opinion. Also this looks very promotional. AlessandroTiandelli333 (talk) 08:25, 2 August 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.