Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dresser Johnson


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:34, 21 February 2011 (UTC)

Dresser Johnson

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Notability not established. There appears to be very little in the way of objective reliable sources, with most of the article's content copied from the agency's website. Clear COI. JNW (talk) 14:04, 13 February 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete only one secondary source, everything else is their own website. That one cite though is ok, and if there were some independent refs for the band aid thing that could be enough to support a cut down article.--ThePaintedOne (talk) 15:56, 13 February 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete. Concur. The company might be shown to be notable eventually, and in a new article, this through reasons expressed by ThePaintedOne, but as it stands it is an affront to Wikipedia standards. Acabashi (talk) 21:34, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:39, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:39, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:39, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.