Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dri Duck


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. - Philippe 03:19, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

Dri Duck

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable company, lack of references to reliable sources; article created by former employee. Nomoskedasticity (talk) 19:39, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. The notability of this company is borderline, and, given the fact cleanup tags have consistently been removed by the creator (and I had to remove the promotional language myself after the creator stated there isn't any, see this revision), I am inclined to say the article must go. It should be recreated from scratch by someone more neutral. --  Blanchardb - Me•MyEars•MyMouth - timed 22:07, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep I agree 100% that the notability is borderline, but I found two of the sources seem to pass, and the others are weak. That means multiple sources and yes, that means it passes the Wikisniff test.  I think the article can be fixed without that much trouble, as it isn't really spammy.  Tags, yes.  Delete, too much.  P HARMBOY  ( TALK ) 23:01, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. I don't see which sources provide non-trivial coverage. VG &#x260E; 23:03, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.   -- Undead Warrior (talk) 23:59, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete If I was going shopping for outdoor clothing, or looking for a company to invest in, I would love Dri Duck based upon this article... which reads a bit like a WP:CV and a bit more like a WP:Advert.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 08:54, 5 October 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.