Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Driclor


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. NW ( Talk ) 23:03, 27 August 2009 (UTC)

Driclor

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable product page. Driclor is a brand exclusive to Stiefel rather than a generic product name. Available news articles mention this in passing or as corporate info more suitable for Stiefel Laboratories corporate page if anyone were interested enough to create it. Ash (talk) 21:42, 8 August 2009 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget  22:44, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:21, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions.  -- Cyber cobra  (talk) 05:26, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep or merge into an article for similar products; but there may be too many, and I'm not sure how to divide them up appropriately.    DGG ( talk ) 08:51, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Relisting comment. I usually close these "no consensus" instead of relisting again but the article has no sources and looks like a "semi wikified" product brochure. Possible copyvio but my initial google search didn't hit anything obvious so it might have been paraphrased. This one needs more discussion. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:26, 21 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep - I agree that the product would be better covered at the manufacture's page, but since merging to a non-existent page isn't an option the material should be kept. In any case, the product does pass WP:N via significant coverage in several sources (see ). --ThaddeusB (talk) 00:27, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
 * I have removed all the promotional and howto guide stuff and otherwise edited for tone. --ThaddeusB (talk) 00:33, 21 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Weak keep per improvements. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:03, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. No indication that product meets WP:GNG or WP:PRODUCT. Bongo  matic  01:43, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.