Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Drift: The Sideways Craze (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep and close. Bad faith nomination coming just 11 hours after the close of the last discussion. Non admin closure. PC78 (talk) 12:06, 6 February 2009 (UTC)

Drift: The Sideways Craze
AfDs for this article: 
 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable film. unreliable source. Delete per WP:WEB and WP:CORP as they require multiple sources. PSNMand (PSNMand) 21:07, 3 February 2009
 * Speedy close - previous AfD only closed 11 hours before this one was started, what can have changed in that time? -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 09:00, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.   —PC78 (talk) 00:07, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
 * concur with speedy keep. Last AfD said experts were needed to find better sources. 11 hours hardly gives them enought time! Did anyone even ask at the relevant wiki-projects?Yobmod (talk) 07:48, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy Close per bad faith nomination. 11 hours since the last AfD closed??? Sheesh. Further, and worth considering, the nom is/was blocked and using puppets to circumvent the block. Sheesh again.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 20:50, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy close - regardless of my opinion from the last AFD (it was delete), this is far too soon to bring this article back to AFD. -- Whpq (talk) 22:14, 5 February 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.