Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Driftwood (novel)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 05:51, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

Driftwood (novel)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Looks to me to be a non-notable book. Hiding T 15:11, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. North America1000 23:04, 8 September 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep. It took me a while since the name is so common, but I've found just enough to justify a keep overall. If it were just the trade reviews I might balk, but there's a review from a radio station and the Wall Street Journal, which helps out a lot. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  06:22, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep per rescue by User:Tokyogirl79, Sadads (talk) 13:22, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:11, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep -- sources are sufficient to meet GNG at this time, thanks to Tokyogirl. K.e.coffman (talk) 07:44, 17 September 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.