Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Drill 'n bass


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  Singu larity  07:58, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

Drill %27n bass
AfDs for this article: Special:Prefixindex/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Drill %27n bass
 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Bad, contentious article, based on an underground non-notable genre name. Article is barely sourced, with no good sources available, only an out of date allmusic guide, and the fact that some mp3 websites list the name as a category. This genre name doesn't deserve its own article, especially as the 4 artists which supposedly are the only notable artists in the genre have been on the same record label (Rephlex Records). Mansour Said (talk) 19:19, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  15:13, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Sorry Newsnight Watcher, this is just not notable enough. Leave the mention on the relevant artist pages though. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.0.122.225 (talk) 17:53, 28 May 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete, never heard of it. Fee Fi Foe Fum (talk) 21:53, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
 * See WP:IDONTKNOWIT. – thedemonhog   talk  •  edits  03:22, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete as notability has not been established and the genre ended seven years ago so notability is unlikely to be established in the future. – thedemonhog   talk  •  edits  03:22, 2 June 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.