Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Drillinginfo


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Lankiveil (speak to me) 07:53, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

Drillinginfo

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Seems perhaps not notable. I also have a concern with a possible conflict of interest with relatively recent edits. Raymie (t • c) 21:57, 25 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 00:26, 27 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Week keep. Looking given external links, it seems that this company meets notability criteria. However, the article needs a rewriting due to WP:COI and WP:ADVERT. Beagel (talk) 04:44, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 1 June 2011 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Logan Talk Contributions 00:11, 9 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete gnews shows no extensive indepth coverage, most of the hits come from one newspaper. Fails WP:GNG. LibStar (talk) 11:08, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete: I agree that this fails the GNG and WP:CORP. That the company might have attracted some modest notice in industry journals is all very well and good, but to quote WP:CORP, "[A]ttention solely from local media, or media of limited interest and circulation, is not an indication of notability; at least one regional, national, or international source is necessary."  There is no evidence of any such source.   Ravenswing  14:06, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.