Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Drink while you think


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 08:35, 1 December 2022 (UTC)

Drink while you think

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Unencylopedic entry, non-reliable sources and doesn't meet WP:GNG. Initially PRODed but creator removed and attempted to improve. echidnaLives -  talk  -  edits  10:19, 24 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions.  echidnaLives  -  talk  -  edits  10:19, 24 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete - As well as failing WP:GNG, this also fails WP:NOTGUIDE. ProofRobust  17:36, 24 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete - not encyclopedic Flibbertigibbets (talk) 19:08, 24 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Merge to word chain. --Belbury (talk) 13:04, 25 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete for all the reasons stated by EchidnaLives Joyous! | Talk 19:16, 25 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:NOTGUIDE and WP:GNG. Jontesta (talk) 00:27, 26 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete per nom. All of the sources does not count to WP:GNG, I could not locate more refs contributing to GNG per WP:BEFORE. The article also violates WP:NOTGUIDE; I oppose a merge/redirect, there is nothing here sourced to reliable sources that are worth preserving and this is an implausible search term.  VickKiang  (talk)  10:07, 28 November 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.