Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Drugs specifically targeted to treat premature ejaculation


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Sr13 08:29, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

Drugs specifically targeted to treat premature ejaculation

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

This article exists only for spammers to attach advertising. Should be deleted with redirect to Premature ejaculation. Merge discussion has gone nowhere. edgarde 04:19, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Merge to premature ejaculation. Doesn't require its own article. Resolute 04:22, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete I dont think wikipedia should be the place where people come to look up medicine information due to the how easy it is to modify stuff.  Reference desk/guidelines/Medical advice also warns against giving out medical advice, which I think this article does to a certain degree.  Corpx 07:26, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete spam magnet with little encyclopedic value. Merge anything good, but I'm not seeing anything there. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  15:47, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, I'm not sure that a merge is necessary here. Premature ejaculation already seems to cover anything useful this article might present.  Ark yan  &#149; (talk) 15:56, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, but merge anything good. Bart133 (t) (c) 18:11, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletions.   -- John Vandenberg 12:07, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. The unique content relates to currently unlicensed drugs that seem unlikely to be marketed soon -- a Medline search finds only one small phase II study on TEMPE and the FDA seem unlikely to approve dapoxetine. The general principles of local anaesthetics & SSRIs are adequately covered in the article on premature ejaculation, with dapoxetine already mentioned briefly. The phrasing of the title makes it unlikely that it will be a search term. Espresso Addict 23:33, 9 July 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.