Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Drum wrench

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was KEEP. mikka (t) 16:08, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Drum wrench
Delete... WikiDictionary at best. Totally non-notable and non-expandable topic. Most of the text discusses Operator Training and Safety 'stuff'. IMHO, this is a joke article, or possibly an Advert trying hard to present the last line with the phrase 'Man Tool'. In comparison see: http://www.northerntool.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/ProductDisplay?storeId=6970&productId=40554&R=40554 Fabartus 01:48, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)


 * Keep This article seems like it has potential to expand much further and improve.  &#1090;&#601; z&#1108; &#1090;&#1110;  07:11, Jun 10, 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. --Metropolitan90 17:18, Jun 10, 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge with drum, partially redundant. Radiant_ &gt;|&lt; 09:57, Jun 10, 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep I created this article to be the first in a series of articles about esoteric tools. There is still much more I could write about this tool, so it could be expanded. I am not trying to advertise for a product, and i guess you guys don't like the "man tool" business, but it is a correct slang version for a drum wrench. User:Garfield 686
 * Keep, real tool, better separate from drum. Kappa 12:40, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, as per Kappa. One of a series of specialized wrenches. DialUp 13:33, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge per Radiant. --Xcali 15:59, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Modification: merge to Drum (container). --Xcali 19:06, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep per Kappa. Its a wrench, not a drum. Don't merge. DS1953 17:05, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge with Drum (container) --Carnildo 21:15, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge with Drum (container) Shimmin 12:36, Jun 11, 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge to Wrench. Manufacturers of these things have less information than this on their websites.  A lot of this article is nonsense; "Considered by many to be the standard in drum opening technology, the 168 is quality constructed in the USA and needs almost no service." how can a this wrench require service?  It has no moving parts! --Robojames 18:08, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Prejudicial Comment - The user "User:Garfield 686" is not a log in name. I'm inclusionist by nature, but the article has very little Fact and a lot of fluff. As I sit here, I have three drums less than 100 ft from me. The whole arty is nonsensical. If it were expandable, why has it not changed? Fabartus 23:48, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment-2 - Since nominating this article, I expanded the Drum (Container) by about eightfold. But it itself needs merged with 44 gallon drum (Brittish) or we should keep both since the idioms vary so much. I just added both links to the above as see alsos   [[User:fabartus || TalktoMe]] 03:29, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages.  Please do not edit this page .