Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Drumfunk


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to drum & bass. Feel free to merge any usable content from the page history. (non-admin closure) Tim Song (talk) 09:31, 8 March 2010 (UTC)

Drumfunk

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Sub sub sub genre. This one is "usually much more complex" drum and bass. Not unique, no real development, or history. Ridernyc (talk) 04:39, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:04, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Totally subjective and undefinable and unsourced term for yet another music sub genre. Guyonthesubway (talk) 19:17, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect to drum & bass. In general, if a subgenre term is in use (as this is), i.e. it is a valid search term, but not independently notable, the proper thing to do is merge and redirect to the parent genre. This can be done without taking it to AfD, as no admin-only actions are necessary. &mdash; Gwalla | Talk 19:26, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect I did some reading on the subject and came to the same conclusions as Gwalla. gidonb (talk) 04:02, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect and also add some sources. There are no sources on this page, and a lot of the artists and labels allegedly involved with drumfunk are red-linked. It doesn't seem notable enough for its own wikipedia article. Backtable Speak to meconcerning my deeds. 04:31, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Not much point in a merge, given the lack of reliable sources. That is really just moving the problem somewhere else. By all means add material to Drum and Bass based on WP:RP on this topic.-- SabreBD  (talk)  15:03, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
 * But would you object to a redirect? Usage of the term is easy enough to verify, which IMO demonstrates that it's a valid search term. &mdash; Gwalla | Talk 17:58, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.